On January 25, 2024, the Office of Government Information Services launched a stealth attack on the use of the term “Glomar,” posting on its blog, the FOIA Ombudsman, that it hoped agencies would “retire the term” following the federal FOIA Advisory Committee’s recommendation to do so in 2022.

Notably, although OGIS chairs the FOIA Advisory Committee and may comment and vote on proposed recommendations, it said nothing about this issue during the two public committee meetings at which it was discussed: Dec. 9, 2021 (transcript), and Mar. 10, 2022 (transcript with vote). According to the transcript minutes of the former meeting, OGIS reportedly provided input about “Glomar” to the sponsors of the recommendation. The substance of OGIS’s comments has never been officially released, however. By contrast, the Department of Justice was forthright in the meetings about its disagreement with the recommendation, and four committee members—including yours truly—voted against it. DOJ abstained from voting, as is its practice. No vote was recorded for OGIS, whose director missed the March 10, 2022 meeting.

The committee’s non-unanimous recommendation was approved by the Archivist of the United States. It remains pending at the Department of Justice (where it should die).