FOIA Advisor

FOIA News: DHS to requesters: use a portal

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

On December 23, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security issued a final rule amending its regulations to clarify that Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act requests generally must be submitted through DHS web portals or via FOIA.gov, rather than by email, fax, or mail. The revised regulations permit alternative submission methods only in limited circumstances—for example, for incarcerated individuals or others who are unable to submit requests online.

DHS did not solicit public comment on the rule. The final rule takes effect on January 22, 2026.

FOIA News: NJ's Gov.-elect declines to release Navy records

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment


Sherrill rejects participating with FOIA request on Navy records

She faced questions around her role in a cheating scandal shortly before Election Day.

By Daniel Han & Madison Fernandez, PolitcoPro, Dec. 22, 2025

EAST BRUNSWICK, New Jersey — Gov.-elect Mikie Sherrill is declining to participate with a public records request to authorize the release of her Navy disciplinary records, her transition team told POLITICO.

POLITICO put in a federal Freedom of Information Act request requesting Sherrill’s Navy records — specifically for disciplinary records related to an academic cheating scandal that happened when Sherrill was in the Naval academy. The Navy said access to such records would require Sherrill to authorize them, which her transition team said she would not do.

Read more here (access with free trial subscription).

Court opinion issued Dec. 18, 2025

Court Opinions (2025)Ryan MulveyComment

Am. First Legal Found. v. Roberts (D.D.C.) — granting the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; holding that the Judicial Conference of the United States and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts are not “agencies” for purposes of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) because they are not “like the Executive Branch entities FOIA explicitly contemplates,” nor are they “government corporations” or “independent agencies,” all of which are indisputably subject to the statute; explaining that, while the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office are not literally “courts,” plaintiff’s “too cramped” reading of the statute ignored how these entities serve important “supporting” functions within the Judicial Branch, both with respect to its policymaking and day-to-day administration; noting, moreover, the “well-trodden path” of past caselaw confirming neither entity is subject to FOIA from which the court saw “no reason to stray”; finally, highlighting the “arbitrary” “line drawing” that would ensue if FOIA applied to any part of the Judicial Branch that was not literally part of “the courts,” i.e., “judges and ‘law clerks,’” as the requester posited based on the phrasing of 5 U.S.C. § 551(1)(B).

Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.

Court opinions issued Dec. 15-16, 2025

Court Opinions (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Dec. 16, 2025

Heritage Found. v. DOJ (D.D.C.) -- denying plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees pertaining to its request for expedited treatment of its request for records related to FBI’s search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in 2022; finding that DOJ had already decided to expedite processing before plaintiffs filed suit, so their litigation did not substantially cause the agency to act.

Dec. 15, 2025

African Immigrant Rights Council v. USCIS (D. Md.) -- denying without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, concluding that although plaintiff was both eligible and entitled to an award, it failed to show the reasonableness of the amounts sought.

Risenhoover v. DOJ (D.D.C.) -- ruling that: (1) CIA’s and DOD’s searches were adequate, rejecting challenges to their scope, and granted summary judgment to the State Department after finding no evidence it received a FOIA request; (2) CIA properly issued a Glomar response under Exemptions 1 and 3 to a request seeking records of an alleged classified CIA affiliation with certain groups, and DOD properly withheld government directives and communications related to Taiwan based on Exemption 5’s presidential communications privilege; and (3) pro se plaintiff was ineligible for attorney’s fees.

Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.

FOIA News: USCIS has reduced backlog via bad-faith FOIA denials, claims whistleblower

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

USCIS’ arbitrarily strict FOIA policy is keeping some migrants from receiving their immigration records, whistleblower alleges

In a protected disclosure to Congress, an agency employee claims that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services since 2024 has been finding ways to reject Freedom of Information Act requests from migrants in order to make it seem like the agency is complying with a court order.

By Sean Michael Newhouse, Gov’t Exec., Dec. 19, 2025

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a Dec. 15 compliance report that it reduced its Freedom of Information Act request backlog for certain immigration records by 99.96% over the course of three months, an impressive feat given recent workforce cuts to agency FOIA teams and a 43-day government shutdown occurred during the period. 

But a whistleblower disclosure sent to the Senate Homeland Security and Judiciary committees on Friday argues that the agency has adopted unnecessarily strict criteria to summarily reject FOIA requests from migrants seeking documents for their immigration proceedings. 

“The circumstances alongside the whistleblower’s disclosures suggest the reported reduction does not reflect timely, good-faith FOIA processing but rather mass closures of requests and other procedural mechanisms that remove requests from the pending inventory without reasonable searches or release of responsive records,” according to the document. 

Read more here.

FOIA News: Federal judge rules judicial agencies not subject to FOIA

FOIA News (2025)Ryan MulveyComment

Judicial offices don’t have to turn over records to Trump-aligned group, judge rules

Tierney Sneed, CNN, Dec. 18, 2025

A federal judge ruled Thursday that two entities that implement policy and conduct administrative tasks for the judicial branch are not required under a transparency law to turn over their communications to a private legal group aligned with President Donald Trump.

The opinion by Judge Trevor McFadden came in a longshot case brought by America First Legal, which argued the judicial offices were the type of executive branch agencies that are covered under the Freedom of Information Act — the federal public records law.

The entities — which are known as the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office, and are led by judges — had refused to produce correspondences with Democratic lawmakers, prompting the FOIA lawsuit.

America First argued that the Judicial Conference is actually an executive agency that should be “overseen by the president, not the courts,” thus putting it under FOIA, which does not cover the judicial branch. The organization also contended during oral arguments last month that FOIA’s exemptions for the courts applied to judges and the law clerks that work in their chambers, but not the clerks and other officials who manage a courthouse’s administrative functions.

Read more here.

FOIA News: Rest in Peace, Bill Burr, FOIA "Yoda"

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

In Memoriam: Dr. William Burr, 1949-2025

Nat’l Sec. Archive, Dec. 15, 2025

The National Security Archive mourns the passing of our beloved colleague William Burr, the documentary leader of the nuclear history field, on December 11, 2025.

Tributes to Bill have poured in over the weekend from all over the world, emphasizing his brilliance as a scholar, his generosity as an archivist, his modesty and integrity as a person, his centrality to the whole field of nuclear studies, and the enormous legacies he leaves to the rest of us.

Read more here.

FOIA News: Treasury exploring cloud platform

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Treasury Seeks FedRAMP-Authorized Cloud Platform for FOIA & eDiscovery

By Miles Jamison, ExecutiveGov, Dec. 16, 2025

The Department of the Treasury, through the Internal Revenue Service, has initiated market research to explore the availability of a cloud-based platform that can handle Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, requests and eDiscovery activities.

* * *

According to a sources sought notice published Monday on SAM.gov, Treasury plans to implement a department-wide blanket purchase agreement for a cloud platform capable of streamlining the processing of electronically stored information, or ESI. It seeks to adopt advanced commercial technologies, including artificial intelligence, machine learning and analytics, to enhance transparency, optimize operations and reduce FOIA backlogs across all bureaus.

The platform must be authorized under the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program to support the full lifecycle of information requests, from intake and processing to review, redaction, production and archival. It must also comply with the Federal Information Security Modernization Act, Section 508 requirements and Treasury cybersecurity directives. Responses are due by Dec. 30.

Read more here.

FOIA News: Group seeks expedited recission of EPA’s FOIA expedition rule

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

‘Environmental justice’ EPA rule drives unequal FOIA treatment, conservative legal group says

By Kaelen Deese, Wash. Exam’r, Dec. 11, 2025

A prominent conservative legal firm with close ties to the Trump administration took aim on Wednesday at a little-noticed Environmental Protection Agency rule from the Biden administration that it says created an improper, preferential fast-track for certain public records requests under the banner of “environmental justice.”

America First Legal, the firm founded by President Donald Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller, filed a major Freedom of Information Act request and a companion petition for rulemaking challenging the EPA’s 2022 decision to let requesters claim a so-called “environmental justice–related need” as a basis for expedited processing. The group says that carveout opened a political pathway to faster access to federal records, contradicting FOIA’s requirement that agencies handle requests in a content-neutral manner.

Read more here.

P.S. In October, FOIA Advisor cited reporting from E&E News that EPA planned to rescind its environmental justice FOIA rule.