Agencies are required to post their fiscal year 2023 annual FOIA reports online no later than March 1, 2024. We’ve started to look for early postings and here are a few that we’ve found. Stay tuned for more in the month ahead.
Securities and Exchange Commission (9481 requests received; 9022 processed)
U.S. Postal Service (4168 requests received; 4104 processed)
Wilson v. FBI (2nd Cir.) -- affirming district court’s decision denying plaintiff attorney’s fees after finding no “abuse of discretion” in lower court’s analysis of relevant “entitlement” factors; noting that although plaintiff was “eligible” for fees because district court had ordered FBI to conduct an additional search for records concerning plaintiff, FBI’s original decision not to search a particular database was reasonable given that no responsive records were located.
Schubert v. FBI (D.D.C.) -- (1) denying plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, because plaintiff impermissibly sought to expand the time scope of his request from nine months to 10 years; (2) FBI properly relied on Exemption 7(C) in refusing to confirm or deny records showing who accessed plaintiff’s criminal history; (3) FBI’s search for first-party records was not required by the request, but nevertheless finding that FBI’s voluntary search was adequate; and (4) Federal Bureau of Prisons performed adequate search despite also finding no records.
N.Y. Times v. FBI (S.D.N.Y.) -- following in camera review of report about “Havana Syndrome,” deciding that: (1) FBI properly redacted information concerning third parties pursuant to Exemption 7(C); and (2) FBI properly relied on Exemption 7(E) to redact certain portions of report, but it could not withhold the report in full using that exemption because one law enforcement technique was known to the public and the report’s introduction and conclusion did not reveal any techniques, procedures, or guidelines at all.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. Earlier opinions are available here.
The next meeting of the federal Freedom of Information Act Advisory Committee will take place virtually on March 5, 2024, one week before the kickoff of Sunshine Week. Additional details are available here. The committee is scheduled to meet in April and May, as well, before concluding its term in June.
Hensley v. DOJ (E.D. Ark.) -- concluding that FBI performed reasonable search for an alleged recording or transcript of agency’s interview of plaintiff prior to his indictment.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. Earlier opinions are available here.
Phillips v. U.S. Bureau of the Census (S.D.N.Y.) -- denying plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs after finding that: (1) plaintiff was eligible for fees and costs because he obtained partial relief from a judicial order, specifically an agency file comparable to the file he requested by a date certain; and (2) plaintiff was not entitled to fees and costs because the agency was preparing to release records well in advance of plaintiff’s request and lawsuit, and because it reasonably denied plaintiff’s request.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. Earlier opinions are available here.
On January 25, 2024, the Office of Government Information Services launched a stealth attack on the use of the term “Glomar,” posting on its blog, the FOIA Ombudsman, that it hoped agencies would “retire the term” following the federal FOIA Advisory Committee’s recommendation to do so in 2022.
Notably, although OGIS chairs the FOIA Advisory Committee and may comment and vote on proposed recommendations, it said nothing about this issue during the two public committee meetings at which it was discussed: Dec. 9, 2021 (transcript), and Mar. 10, 2022 (transcript with vote). According to the transcript minutes of the former meeting, OGIS reportedly provided input about “Glomar” to the sponsors of the recommendation. The substance of OGIS’s comments has never been officially released, however. By contrast, the Department of Justice was forthright in the meetings about its disagreement with the recommendation, and four committee members—including yours truly—voted against it. DOJ abstained from voting, as is its practice. No vote was recorded for OGIS, whose director missed the March 10, 2022 meeting.
The committee’s non-unanimous recommendation was approved by the Archivist of the United States. It remains pending at the Department of Justice (where it should die).
OIP Now Accepting Nominations for the 2024 Sunshine Week FOIA Awards
By DOJ/OIP, FOIA Post, Jan. 23, 2024
The Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy (OIP) is pleased to announce that nominations are open for the 2024 Sunshine Week FOIA Awards, recognizing the contributions of FOIA professionals from around the government. As the Attorney General recognized in his FOIA Guidelines issued in March 2022, “[t]he federal government could not process the hundreds of thousands of FOIA requests that are received every year without its dedicated FOIA professionals.” Agency FOIA professionals are at the center of ensuring successful FOIA administration and we look forward to celebrating the work of these individuals from around the government. For this year’s event, OIP is seeking nominations for five categories of awards:
Read more here.
Bonner v. FBI (S.D.N.Y.) -- (1) denying plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of court’s decision upholding FBI’s Exemption 3 claims regarding records related to Abu Zubaydah’s detention; (2) CIA properly invoked Exemption 3 in conjunction with the National Security Act to protect information, in whole or in part, within 711 redactions made by the FBI pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(C); and (3) FBI properly relied on Exemptions 6, 7(C), and 7(E) to withhold certain information not claimed by the CIA to fall under Exemption 3.
Hernandez, Jr. v. DOJ (D.D.C.) -- granting summary judgment to government after finding that Executive Office for United States Attorneys performed adequate search, plaintiff received all materials responsive to his request (notwithstanding initial miscounting of pages), and plaintiff did not challenge EOUSA’s redactions.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. Earlier opinions are available here.
Buzzfeed v. DOJ (D.D.C.) -- granting government’s partial motion for reconsideration after concluding that plaintiff had failed to brief—and thus waived its right to dispute—the issue of whether Exemption 4 protects the identities of contractors that supply lethal injection drugs to the government; noting that plaintiff’s reply brief expressly stated that the only Exemption 4 issue concerned the withholding of other information; further rejecting plaintiff’s argument that a change in controlling law allowed plaintiff to revive the issue.
Gun Owners of America v. FBI (D.D.C.) -- finding that agency properly relied on Exemption 7(E) to withhold aerial-surveillance video of civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin in August 2020, and that no foreseeable harm analysis was necessary because agency had met Exemption 7(E)’s circumvention of law requirement.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. Earlier opinions are available here.
Bloomberg v. FTC (D.D.C.) -- ruling that: (1) FTC properly withheld all but three portions of its preconsummation warning letters pursuant to Exemption 3, in conjunction with 15 U.S.C. § 18a(h), specifically the identities of business filers that were already in the public domain, the dates of the warning letter; and boilerplate language; and (2) agency failed to show that Exemption 7(A) protected any of the three portions of the disputed letters set forth above.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. Earlier opinions are available here.