FOIA Advisor

Allan Blutstein

Court opinion issued Apr. 8, 2025

Court Opinions (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Greenspan v. EOUSA (D.D.C.) -- in case seeking investigative records about named individuals who operated a heroin ring in Chicago in the 1990s, ruling that: (1) DEA was precluded from using Glomar response regarding one named individual because DOJ publicly filed an IRS affidavit in a forfeiture matter that expressly acknowledged DEA’s investigation of same individual; (2) both the DEA and FBI were precluded from using Glomar responses with respect to a second named individual (currently Nigeria’s president), because the above-referenced IRS affidavit acknowledged that that individual was criminally investigated by those agencies, among others; and (3) CIA’s Glomar response concerning the Nigerian president was not waived by the presence of documents in the agency’s FOIA Reading Room that generally addresses Nigeria’s involvement with heroin narcotrafficking during the mid-1980s.

Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.

FOIA News: D.C. Circuit to hear argument on OLC legal opinions

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

On April 11, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear a FOIA argument in Campaign for Accountability v. DOJ, No. 24-5163 (D.C. Cir.).

The issue on appeal is whether DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel has an obligation under FOIA’s “reading room” provision, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(2), to affirmatively disclose certain legal opinions. The underlying decision authored by now-Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson held that none of the categories of OLC opinions identified by plaintiff plausibly qualified for affirmative disclosure, except for opinions that resolve disputes between federal agencies.

A livestream of three cases on the court’s calendar will begin at 9:30am EDT. The panel will include Judges Srinivasan, Rao, and Pan.

Court opinion issued Apr. 4, 2025

Court Opinions (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Sanders v. FBI (W.D. Wis.) -- concluding that: (1) FBI’s search for records concerning plaintiff was inadequate because the agency failed to explain why it was reasonable to search only its Central Records System; it neglected to use reasonable variations of plaintiff’s name; and it neglected to explain why its initial search yielded no records and its second (seemingly identical) search located three pages; and (2) FBI did not adequately justify its Exemption 7(C) Glomar response to portion of plaintiff’s request that sought records mentioning plaintiff and various third parties, and remarking that it wasn’t clear why redactions wouldn’t sufficiently protect third parties’ privacy interests.

Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.

Monthly Roundup: April 2025

Monthly Roundup (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Below is a summary of the notable FOIA court decisions and news from last month, as well as a look ahead to FOIA events in April.

Court decisions

We identified and posted 41 decisions in the month of March, our highest monthly count in four years (43 in March 2021). Two notable decisions issued last month emanated from one case, Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. U.S. DOGE Serv., No. 25-cv-511 (D.D.C.), in which the parties dispute whether FOIA applies to the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (USDS or DOGE). On March 10th, the court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff’s request for expedited processing and concluded from the preliminary record (mostly news sources) that DOGE exercised substantial independent authority from the President and therefore “likely” was an agency subject to FOIA. The government quickly moved for reconsideration, but the court denied the motion on March 19th, in large part because the government’s “arguments could all have been raised during the last round of briefing” and “none of them provides a basis for reconsideration.” The court acknowledged, however, that “it would be preferable . . . to review the question of whether [DOGE] is subject to the FOIA on the merits based on a more complete record,” and invited the requester to file a motion for limited discovery. On the same date, the government moved for summary judgment. See the case docket to follow subsequent proceedings.

In a less publicized but nonetheless interesting) decision, the court in Heritage Found. v. DOJ (D.D.C.) considered the meaning of a “request” for the purpose of determining whether plaintiff had exhausted its administrative remedies. Although the FBI administratively divided plaintiff’s single request for three items into three separate requests, the court held that Heritage’s overall submission constituted its FOIA request and therefore Heritage was not required to administratively appeal the FBI’s timely-issued denials for two items (and the separate denial of a fee waiver) because the FBI had failed to timely respond to the third item.

Top News

  • After a nearly two-week delay in publishing data from annual agency FOIA reports, DOJ/OIP reported on March 14th that nearly 1.5 million requests had been received across the government in fiscal year 2024, up 25 percent from fiscal year 2023. DHS alone received more than 900,000 requests.

  • Sunshine Week (March 16-22) included a privately organized Sunshine Fest that generated a slew of research ideas, as well as a panel discussion hosted by the National Archives. The Department of Justice’s annual event was either canceled or not public; DOJ was silent on the matter.

  • DOJ/OIP issued its annual Litigation and Compliance Report on or about March 10th. Of note, requesters filed 889 FOIA lawsuits in calendar year 2024—the highest number of suits DOJ has ever reported.

  • DOJ/OIP’s director, Bobak Talebian, was fired on March 8th, along with several other heads of DOJ components.

  • The federal FOIA Advisory Committee for the 2024-2026 term met on March 6.

April Events

Apr. 8: Introduction to the FOIA Training,10:00am to 1:30pm EST.

Apr. 8: U.S. Senate Judiciary FOIA hearing, 10:15am EST.

Apr. 11: D.C. Circuit argument in Campaign for Accountability v. DOJ, No. 24-5163, 9:30am EST.

Apr. 16: Processing a FOIA Request from Start to Finish Training, 10:00am to 12:00pm EST.

Apr. 25: Deadline for agencies to report FY25 Q2 data.

Court opinion issued Mar. 30, 2025

Court Opinions (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Farris v. Garland (D.D.C.) -- determining that: (1) the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys conducted a reasonable search for certain records related to plaintiff’s conviction for drug trafficking, and it had no obligation to obtain records maintained by other federal or local agencies; (2) government properly withheld certain information from investigative “DEA 6 Reports” pursuant to Exemptions 7(C), 7(D), and 7(E).

Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.

Court opinion issued Mar. 28, 2025

Court Opinions (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Serv. (D.D.C.) -- finding that: (1) federal contractor’s appraisal of a land exchange between the government and defendant-intervenor, a private mining company, qualified as an “agency record” because the agency “constructively controlled” the appraisal based on the four-factor test set forth in Burka v. HHS, 87 F.3d 508 (D.C. Cir. 1996); using the same test, finding that the contractor’s documents containing data underlying the appraisal were not agency records; (2) agency justified withholding information that would result in foreseeable economic harm to defendant-intervenor, but offered only inadmissible hearsay as to whether withheld information that would result in foreseeable harms to the appraiser and third-party experts’ business interests; (3) agency properly invoked Exemption 5’s deliberative process privilege to withhold the appraisal, summary, and technical report as pre-decisional and deliberative, but rejecting the reasonableness of the harms foreseen by the agency; and (4) agency’s segregability analysis was insufficient because the agency inconsistently processed an appraisal summary and a technical report.

Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.

FOIA News: HHS slashes FOIA staff at multiple agencies; centralized FOIA office in the works, says HHS.

FOIA News (2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

RFK Jr. purges CDC and FDA's public records teams, despite "transparency" promises

By Alexander Tin, CBS News, Apr. 1, 2025

Teams handling Freedom of Information Act requests at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration were gutted Tuesday as part of the widespread job cuts ordered by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., multiple officials said. 

* * *

All of the workers in the CDC's FOIA office were cut, two officials said. Two-thirds of the Food and Drug Administration's records request staff were also cut, down to 50 remaining. 

* * *

Many FOIA staff at the National Institutes of Health were also let go, one official said, but not all. No explanation was given for why some were cut while others remain on the job, the official said, in an apparent violation of the federal government's procedures for prioritizing for some employees based on their military and federal service.

The goal of the cuts is to create a central place to handle FOIA requests for the entire department, an HHS official said, making it easier for the public to submit their requests. 

Read more here.

[Earlier in the day, Bloomberg News reported that the FDA, CDC, and the NIH had sacked all of their FOIA employees.]