Friends of Animals v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv. (10th Cir.) -- affirming in part and reversing in part district court’s decision and holding that: (1) agency properly relied on Exemption 7(C) to withhold names of individuals importing African giraffe parts or products; (2) Exemption 7(C) did not protect names of individuals importing African elephant skins and parts because names were publicly available elsewhere and prospect of harassment was “primarily speculative”; and (3) agency could not sustain its Exemption 4 withholdings using agency affidavit containing inadmissible hearsay.statements. A partial dissent argued that the majority undervalued the privacy interests of elephant importers and overvalued the public interests at stake.
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here.